"JTEM" <jtem01@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:24d54fbd-f0d2-49f1-88f0-f6fb53898a03@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Lars Wilson" <siaxa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Amarna Letter EA 27
>
> Cites. Multiple cites.
>
> After all, you are as dishonest as they come...
>
Haaaaaa! Deal with it!
"THE DELIAN PROBLEM, the most famous of the collection, is often referred
to
as the Delian problem due to a legend that the Delians had consulted Plato
on the subject. In another form, the story asserts that the Athenians in
430
B.C. consulted the oracle at Delos in the hope to stop the plague ravaging
their country. They were advised by Apollo to double his altar that had
the
form of a cube. As a result of several failed attempts to satisfy the god,
the pestilence only worsened and at the end they turned to Plato for
advice."
See anything wrong with this? Of course, you wouldn't. Let me help you.
Plato was born in 428 BCE. This allegedly happened in 430 BCE, two years
before his birth.
Meaning?
Meaning the war was moved back in time at least 20-30 years. Plato needs
to
be an adult of some esteem in order for this to match. When the timeline
is corrected by eclipse matching the war begins in 403 BCE so Plato is
actually 25 years of age when this really happened.
AND....?
And that means 56 years of fake Greek history now is in place tripping up
archaeologists who use the uncorrected timeline. Like Israel Finkelstein
who mistakenly assigns the 871 BCE destruction of Rehov and Megiddo much
later to 835 BCE based upon the Assyrian timeline that is 54 years too
early, based on the 763 BCE eclipse rather than the 709 BCE eclipse.
RC14
specific pointers show 871 BCE as the highest probability date for this
event, but that is ignored because the Assyrian timeline, fixed by an
eclipse, is believed to be reliable. But it is not. So just like it
makes
more sense for Plato to be 25 rather than 2 years from birth for the
"Delian
Problem" to work, likewise, when the 709 BCE eclipse is used to date the
Assyrian Period, ****shak's invasion now dated to 925 BCE drops down to 871
BCE, precisely where the RC14 is pointing. That means ****shak really did
destroy this level rather than Hazeal as Finkelstein has *****sed. Thus
this is not true archaeology but a chronology issue. Archaeologists need
to
consult Biblical and secular chronologists first before making their
*****sments. When they don't, they end up with egg in their face.
Thanks, JTEM, for sup****ting me. I appreciate it.
Lars
(New!) Corrected Timeline Outline:
http://www.geocities.com/siaxares/709guide.html
|
