"Lars Wilson" <siaxa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
[----lies & rants---]
You're insane.
Your idea of an "eclipse" recorded at Ugarit is a theory. That's
all it is, just a theory. There isn't even anything to compare it
to, in order to sup****t the theory.
That's right, if it records an eclipse than it's unique. Meaning,
there is not a single other eclipse recorded at Ugarit.
This is powerful evidence that it is NOT the record of an eclipse.
The fact that at no other time did they find an eclipse worthy
of recording suggests that they didn't record eclipses.
You could argue that their culture changed, that at one time
they had no interest in such things as an eclispse, but (perhaps
do to exposure to other cultures) they developed an interest.
Problem is, that pushes your "eclipse" far LATER than your
agenda requires.... even as it fails to raise your "eclipse"
above the level of a theory.
The eclipse couldn't have occured when your agenda needs it
to have occured -- if you want to use the above rationalization --
because centuries would follow WITHOUT a single eclipse
being recorded. So if you want to admit that, yeah, Ugarit
NEVER recorded Eclipses, but they later LEARNED to see
them as significant (from other cultures), than your eclipse
must date to some time AFTER the hundreds of years of
history were no records of any Eclipse was made.
You know, long AFTER Akhenaten.... around the time of the
city's destruction...
|
