On Jun 21, 1:53=A0am, eugene@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Eugene Griessel) wrote:
> "D. Spencer Hines" <pant...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >Nilita Gay was happy to get pregnant out of wedlock too.
>
> Oh wow! =A0What a discovery. =A0David Sherlock Holmes is outdoing
himself=
..
> It's about time he woke up and smelled the coffee. =A0More than 60% of
> pregnancies occur out of wedlock these days. =A0So what - wedlock is an
> outdated man made invention of control and is designed mainly to
> assure inheritance. =A0Pure male chauvinism at its worst. And it only
> works partially at the best of times. =A0Pre-WW2 a famous early
> researcher into genetics (he went on to win the Nobel prize) went
> around some of the top private maternity homes in New York state
> collecting blood from mothers, babies and fathers for his research.
> Over a thousand cases in his sample. He never published that
> particular study due to =A0the simple fact that more than 10% of the
> babies born had not been sired by the legal lawfully wedded husband.
> A more recent study done in Europe suggests an even higher percentage.
> So what would you prefer - born out of wedlock or a good chance your
> daddy ain't your daddy? =A0Anyway only someone stuck in the rut of
> outdated middle-class thinking would let it matter. =A0Who one's parents
> are - or if they underwent some farcical ceremony prior to one's
> conception - has no bearing on who the child is.
>
> Eugene L Griessel
>
>
You left out that marriage has served as protection for women
and children.
