Re: Randy Massachusetts Schoolgirls Abuse Innocent Boys.

"Andrew Chaplin" <ab.chaplin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>My mother's cousin was a WOI in the CWAC (neat badges: the collar dogs
figured 
>the helmeted head of Athena) she was a formidable person, as was just
about 
>any Canadian who put up WOI insignia. Our service women were among the
first 
>in Canada to get wage parity, but they did not have access to all the 
>occupations until the early 90s. Weapons training for them started in the

>early 70s. The only field still excluding them is submarines, and that is
to 
>change, AIUI.

Our women - at least the army types - got weapons training from 1966
onwards.  Although it was fondly hoped they would never actually need
it.  I belonged to one of those part-time, after-hour groups which
mainly provided the army with training.  Rioters, terrorists - you
name it we could supply. I can remember fairly early in the seventies
being sequestered in a flat with a lady cor****al and a sergeant (plus
one other navy male) (armed to the teeth) for the pongoes to come and
winkle out.  An exciting way to spend a weekend.  I recall killing the
brigadier in charge that weekend (having taken him hostage with a toy
waterpistol - after being captured and allegedly searched) and having
an enthusiastic pongo sniper open up on the pair of us.  He did not
half get a dressing down from the Brigadier - the enthusiastic sniper
that was.

Anyway getting back to the point both women were fully combat trained
and they were both very good.  Adept at secreting weaponry where male
searchers were loathe to look as well - at one stage they captured all
four of us and took us for interrogation.  Everyone of us having a
thunderflash in our undergarments missed by the searchers.  We had fun
blowing up the interrogators!

Eugene L Griessel

   The secret ballot is a beautiful system that permits you to claim
   you never voted for the guy.

          -  I usually post only from Sci.Military.Naval  -