CBS' Lara Logan, CNN's Michael Ware Involved In Steamy Baghdad Love
Triangle:
Lara Logan, Michael Ware Involved In Steamy Baghdad Love Triangle:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/26/lara-logan-michael-ware-i_n_109331=
..html
Check out the Lara Logan youtube video which conveys what she said
about the 'American' media in the 'related video' section at the right
of the following youtube of Scott McClellan being questioned about the
neocon agenda at Barnes & Noble in Santa Monica (California) the week
before last:
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DLktFfHciyqg&feature=3DPlayList&p=3D9B04282=
8F94D1917&index=3D0&playnext=3D1
Here is a tiny URL for the above:
http://tinyurl.com/6qpcnx
Additional at the following URL:
http://tinyurl.com/6dbw4q
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
Take a look at the youtube video linked via the following URL to see
how even '60 Minutes' isn't worth watching for the full story either:
Apologize to the World Mr. Wallace and Return that Emmy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DonNzrNEFs1E&feature=3DPlayList&p=3D181923B=
27C885CDF&index=3D0&playnext=3D1
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's Planning Our Next War?
By Patrick J. Buchanan
VDARE.COM - http://www.vdare.com/buchanan/080626_planning.htm
June 26, 2008
Of the Axis-of-Evil nations named in his State of the Union in 2002,
President Bush has often said, "The United States will not permit the
world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most
destructive weapons."
He failed with North Korea. Will he accept failure in Iran, though
there is no hard evidence Iran has an active nuclear weapons program?
William Kristol of The Weekly Standard said Sunday a U.S. attack on
Iran after the election is more likely should Barack Obama win.
Presumably, Bush would trust John McCain to keep Iran nuclear free.
Yet, to start a third war in the Middle East against a nation three
times as large as Iraq, and leave it to a new president to fight,
would be a daylight hijacking of the congressional war power and a
criminally irresponsible act. For Congress alone has the power to
authorize war.
Yet Israel is even today pu****ng Bush into a pre-emptive war with a
****d threat to attack Iran itself should Bush refuse the cup.
In April, Israel held a five-day civil defense drill. In June, Israel
sent 100 F-15s and F-16s, with refueling tankers and helicopters to
pick up downed pilots, toward Greece in a simulated attack, a dress
rehearsal for war. The planes flew 1,400 kilometers, the distance to
Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.
Ehud Olmert came home from a June meeting with Bush to tell Israelis:
"We reached agreement on the need to take care of the Iranian
threat. ... I left with a lot less question marks regarding the means,
the timetable restrictions and American resoluteness. ...
"George Bush understands the severity of the Iranian threat and the
need to vanquish it, and intends to act on the matter before the end
of his term. ... The Iranian problem requires urgent attention, and I
see no reason to delay this just because there will be a new president
in the White House seven and a half months from now."
If Bush is discussing war on Iran with Ehud Olmert, why is he not
discussing it with Congress or the nation?
On June 6, Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz threatened, "If Iran
continues its nuclear weapons program, we will attack it." The price
of oil shot up 9 percent.
Is Israel bluffing=97or planning to attack Iran if America balks?
Previous air strikes on the PLO command in Tunis, on the Osirak
reactor in Iraq and on the presumed nuclear reactor site in Syria last
September give Israel a high degree of credibility.
Still, attacking Iran would be no piece of cake.
Israel lacks the stealth and cruise-missile capacity to degrade Iran's
air defenses systematically and no longer has the element of surprise.
Israeli planes and pilots would likely be lost.
Israel also lacks the ability to stay over the target or conduct
follow-up strikes. The U.S. Air Force bombed Iraq for five weeks with
hundreds of daily runs in 1991 before Gen. Schwarzkopf moved.
Moreover, if Iran has achieved the capacity to enrich uranium, she has
surely moved centrifuges to parts of the country that Israel cannot
reach=97and can probably replicate anything lost.
Israel would also have to over-fly Turkey, or Syria and U.S.-occupied
Iraq, or Saudi Arabia to reach Natanz. Turks, Syrians and Saudis would
deny Israel permission and might resist. For the U.S. military to let
Israel over-fly Iraq would make us an accomplice. How would that sit
with the Europeans who are sup****ting our sanctions on Iran and want
the nuclear issue settled diplomatically?
And who can predict with certitude how Iran would respond?
Would Iran attack Israel with rockets, inviting retaliation with
Jericho and cruise missiles from Israeli submarines? Would she close
the Gulf with suicide-boat attacks on tankers and U.S. war****ps?
With oil at $135 a barrel, Israeli air strikes on Iran would seem to
ensure a 2,000-point drop in the Dow and a world recession.
What would Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria do? All three are now in
indirect negotiations with Israel. U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq
could be made by Iran to pay a high price in blood that could force
the United States to initiate its own air war in retaliation, and to
finish a war Israel had begun. But a U.S. war on Iran is not a
decision Bush can outsource to Ehud Olmert.
Tuesday, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Michael Mullins left for
Israel. CBS News cited U.S. officials as conceding the trip comes
"just as the Israelis are mounting a full court press to get the Bush
administration to strike Iran's nuclear complex."
Vice President Cheney is said to favor U.S. strikes. Secretary of
Defense Robert Gates and Mullins are said to be opposed.
Moving through Congress, powered by the Israeli lobby, is House
Resolution 362, which demands that President Bush impose a U.S.
blockade of Iran, an act of war.
Is it not time the American people were consulted on the next war that
is being planned for us?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Paul Speaks Out Against War With Iran:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=3D87
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D7354M1QmGYQ&fmt=3D18
Ron Paul Floor Speech on Iran & Foreign Policy
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=3D83
House Resolution Calls for Naval Blockade against Iran
America=92s powerful pro-Israel lobby pressures the US Congress
by Andrew W Cheetham
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=3Dva&aid=3D9377
Re: AIPAC is pu****ng us to war with Iran for Israel
See Video:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2007/10/re-aipac-is-pu****ng-us-to-w=
ar-with-iran.html
Here is a tiny URL for the above one:
http://tinyurl.com/22br9u
Israeli Threat Spikes Our Oil Prices, We Pay More For This (click on
the pic at the following URL to access the youtube video):
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/06/israeli-threat-spikes-our-o=
il-prices-we.html
Here is a tiny URL of the above one:
http://tinyurl.com/5drqxl
Iran War Resolution May Be Passed Next Week:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=3D91563
Scott McClellan Questioned about Neocon Push for Iraq War
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DLktFfHciyqg&feature=3DPlayList&p=3D9B04282=
8F94D1917&index=3D0&playnext=3D1
Here is a tiny URL for the above:
http://tinyurl.com/6qpcnx
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/06/scott-mcclellan-questioned-=
about-neocon.html
Here is the tiny URL for the above one:
http://tinyurl.com/6gzo4o
Pat Buchanan's 'Whose War?' article is a must read as well via the
following URL:
Whose War (Israel's war!)?:
http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
---------------------------
Subject: Re: Ron Paul Speaks Out Against War With Iran
Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 3:08 PM
Just saw the following comment post by David Robertson (of Inverness,
Scotland) at the following URL:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=3D83#comments
NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL Says:
June 27th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
Dear David,
Just saw the following post by you as such has been my same exact
concern as well. See the following URLs when you can:
http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
David Robertson, Inverness, Scotland Says:
June 27th, 2008 at 5:45 am
The United States has about 10,000 nuclear warheads while Israel has
an estimated 300. I have also read that Israel has the targeting codes
for America=92s nuclear arsenal which they acquired through espionage.
In other words these allies, or any one of them acting alone, could
=93obliterate=94 Iran as Hillary Clinton promised she would do if Iran
attacked Israel. She didn=92t say what she would consider to be an
=93attack=94. To me the much more profound threat to peace is Israel who
continues to beat the war drums, to plan to bomb Iran and is promoting
this current resolution to blockade Iran. Americans are being
manipulated to act against their own best interests. Their blood and
treasure has been used and is being used to build a world empire for
an alien power. I have tried to post warnings in different ways on
many blogs but have the definite impression that my words are falling
on deaf ears.
|
