Re: Condoleezza Rice Says She's `Proud' Of Decision To Invade Iraq

On Jul 5, 12:47 pm, "Mark Test" <MARK...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Singanas@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <davidholi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:389f3d3e-5ae0-4edf-a452-8cf0448f3c7c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > On Jul 4, 9:46 pm, Tiglath <te...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > -----------------------------------------
>
> > > > Condoleezza Rice Says She's `Proud' of Decision to Invade Iraq
>
> > > > By Janine Zacharia
>
> > > >  July 3 (Bloomberg) -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said
she's
> > > > ``proud'' of the U.S. decision to wage the Iraq war and insisted
that
> the
> > > > world is not more dangerous than it was when George W. Bush took
> office.
>
> > > Hmmmm.
>
> > > That's a change.   I thought the official line was that the world
was
> > > much safer because of Bush.
>
> Hmmm, they said far worse about Abe Lincoln (who's war killed
> more Americans than all US wars combined).....
>
> snippage
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Well if the neocons had succeeded in stabilizing Iraq,
> > you would now be praising the Bush administration.
> > There was nothing fundamentally wrong about choosing
> > Iraq over Afghanistan as the arena for 9/11 revenge.
> > What went wrong was the management of the intervention.
>
> I'd say we dropped the ball on the post-war plan....
>
> > I think the administration was right not to make Bin Ladin
> > a greater demon than Saddam Hussein.  Bin Ladin is just
> > another misguided fanatic.  Hussein of Baghdad was a greater
> > evil by any measure of  Western values.  Hussein is the
> > Islamic edition of Adolph Hitler.
>
> Concur.....although OBL is damn evil as well.....he just never
> had a country to rule over....
>
> Mark
>
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**

Afghanistan seemed to serve for a while.