"samsloan" <samhsloan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1178464271.238157.259180@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 5, 10:43 pm, "Ray O'Hara" <mary.palmu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "samsloan" <samhsl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >
> > news:1178398743.956472.320760@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > Update on Jefferson-Hemings DNA Testing
> >
> > 1) who cares.
> >
> > 2) if tom was pimping out sally he looks even worse
>
> In spite of your poor use of language, your posting has a valid point.
>
> Defenders of Thomas Jefferson now say that Sally and Tommy were not
> sweethearts and that it was Randy, Tommy's brother, who came by to
> visit on rare occasions and who got Sally pregnant all those times.
>
> Since it has been proven and established that Tommy was around every
> time that Sally got pregnant whereas she never got pregnant when he
> was not around such as the years when he was serving as Secretary of
> State in Philadelphia before Wa****ngton DC became the capital, this,
> if true, would mean that every time Tommy came back to Monticello, he
> would call over his wayward and wandering brother Randy and have him
> come by and have *** with Sally,
>
> One wonders why the defenders of Thomas Jefferson believe that this
> scenario makes Tommy look better than sleeping with Sally himself.
>
> Sam Sloan
>
you come here with you purient posts about tom and sally.
it doesn't matter if they did or didn't. its just perversion on the part
of
you and others who keep making it an issue.
|
