Re: Conclusion re Titanic's rear expansion joint

by Mark Chirnside <mark_chirnside2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 18, 2007 at 01:12 PM

> Didn't OLYMPIC have the same joint, and cross the Atlantic for 30 years
> without its causing any problems?

She was in service for 24 years, but yes.  Could you clarify your
thinking, as I am not sure if I've misunderstood your premise, or
you've misunderstood mine?

Best wishes,

Mark.

8 Posts in Topic:

Conclusion re Titanic's rear expansion joint

"PJF" <pjfno

2007-12-09 16:14:35

Re: Conclusion re Titanic's rear expansion joint

Charles Groark <cgroar

2007-12-09 17:21:40

Re: Conclusion re Titanic's rear expansion joint

sdavmor <sdavmor@[EMAI

2007-12-09 21:25:21

Re: Conclusion re Titanic's rear expansion joint

Mark Chirnside <mark_c