Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


History > Ocean Liners Titanic > What really san...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 4 Topic 582 of 617
Post > Topic >>

What really sank the Titanic

by dougald@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug Urquhart) Jun 14, 2008 at 12:43 PM

I've just finished reading 'What really sank the Titanic" by Jennifer
McCarty and Tim Foecke.

I'm sure that most of you know that Foeke's culprit turns out to be
variability in the wrought iron rivets in Titanic's end sections, but
you might also be interested to know that the book thoroughly debunks
a fair number of myths
-  brittle steel
-  fire weakened the bulkhead
-  rusticles are eating the wreck
and I few others that I forget.

It's a good read, particularly the section on experimental methods and
analysis - no Pellegrinism here.

Incidentally, he doesn't claim that Titanic would have survived with
better rivets - only that the damage would have been less severe, and
she might have stayed afloat for a few more hours.

Regards

Doug Urquhart
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
What really sank the Titanic
dougald@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-14 12:43:09 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
Steven Davies-Morris <  2008-06-14 06:45:41 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
"R.Glueck" <  2008-06-14 10:14:26 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
dougald@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-15 19:08:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 19:37:03 CST 2008.