Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


History > Ocean Liners Titanic > Re: What really...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 4 Topic 582 of 617
Post > Topic >>

Re: What really sank the Titanic

by "R.Glueck" <glueck@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM

I'll be interested to read this, but I think the authority of numerous 
scientists and structural engineers might carry more weight.  I suppose I 
haven't given the authors credit, having not yet read their work.  It
seems 
improbably that the rusticles could be something other than iron consuming

bacteria.  If the rusticles are swept away, what remains of the metal 
underneath?




----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.pronews.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
What really sank the Titanic
dougald@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-14 12:43:09 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
Steven Davies-Morris <  2008-06-14 06:45:41 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
"R.Glueck" <  2008-06-14 10:14:26 
Re: What really sank the Titanic
dougald@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-15 19:08:53 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Nov 22 0:47:47 CST 2008.