I take back what I said about Bob Barr. I found this on the
Libertarian website at:
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/issues/
From the Libertarian website.
"For far too long and at the cost of American blood and treasure, our
great military has been too willingly and quickly used for purposes
other than national defense. Our fighting men and women deserve better
and the integrity of our nation must be restored.
Our National Defense policy must renew a commitment to non-
intervention. We are not the world's police force and our long, yet
recently tarnished, tradition of respecting the sovereignty of other
nations is necessary, not from only a moral standpoint, but to regain
the respect of the world as a principled and peaceful nation.
The proper use of force is clear. If attacked, the aggressor will
experience firsthand the skillful wrath of the American fighting man.
However, invading or initiating force against another nation based
upon perceived threats and speculative intelligence is simply un-
American. We are better than the policy of pre-emptive warfare."
----
If Barr really sup****ts this platform, I will definitely vote for him
for president. I would rather vote for an America-first, science
educated (unlike Obama) realist new Democrat, but there are no such
political animals running in this election. The choice is between the
war monger/lover/imperialist (McCain), the oblivious smiling
starvation king (Obama), and Bob Barr, who is by far and away the
lesser of the evils.
Christopher Calder - http://home.att.net/~meditation/bio-fuel-hoax.html
|
