On 2006-07-24 Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
> As we all know, it was comrade Stalin's brilliant and objective article
> _Marxism and linguistics_ in 1951 (IIRC) that established conclusively
> that language is not a part of the superstructure, and hence formal
> logic is a legitimate non-ideological discipline.
Perhaps Stalin made his propaganda and direction job ...
> I'm wondering whether
> there is any good account of the history of formal logic in USSR,
> especially in its "ideological aspects" - something like _Science and
> philosophy in the Soviet Union_ by Loren Graham, but focusing on logic,
> explicitly excluded by Graham?
.... and let the scientists do their research.
So he was in the fine situation of having control on both. Stalin is
known to be a hard and brutal man, but not as a stupid one.
--
Évitez les comparaisons risquées. Ne dites pas: « Dur comme une pine, rond
comme une couille, mouillé comme ma fente, salé comme du foutre, pas plus
gros que mon petit bouton », et autres expressions qui ne sont pas admises
par le dictionnaire de l'Académie. (Pierre Louÿs, Manuel de civilité ...)


|