On Jul 21, 2:05 pm, "Wolfgang G. Gasser" <z...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Once again Einstein:
>
> Concerning myself, I knew only Lorentz' im****tant work of 1895
> La th=E9orie =E9lectromagn=E9tique de Maxwell and Versuch einer
Theorie
> der elektrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten K=F6rpern
> but not Lorentz later work, nor the consecutive work of Poincar=E9.
> In this sense my work of 1905 was independent.
>
> If one considers "La Science et l'hypoth=E8se" as "consecutive work
> of Poincar=E9" in the relativity domain, then Einstein actually
> seems to be liar.
>
> In a similar case, some have accused Einstein of having lied about
> the Michelson-Morley experiment.
Einstein's 1905 papers on Relativity easily establish himself as a
liar. The forensic evidence lies in the mathematics itself ---
particular the derivation of the Lorentz transform. Einstein's
derivation is garbage. 20 years later, he still had no clues on the
derivation of the Lorentz transform. In his celebrated but very
useless book, Einstein would attempt to pull out the Lorentz transform
from two equations equating zero with zero. Einstein must have seen
the Lorentz transform from somewhere ever since Larmor first wrote it
down back in 1898 or so.
Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.
|
