How about a better topic: Selene w/o Earth
or how about: Earth/Selene binary planets from Sirius
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
Damien Valentine wrote:
> On Jun 21, 10:19 am, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > This seems to suggest that our crystal vacuum dry moon is actually
> > considerably more saturated with the low density element of sodium
> > than Earth...
>
> ...Because the mainstream impact formation theory is the correct one,
> and light elements like sodium and potassium stayed in orbit longer,
> thereby having more chance to accrete into the Moon 4.5 billion years
> ago.
>
> > ...and otherwise way more so than Mars that has hardly its
> > fair share of sodium or much less the remainders of sea-salts which
> > should not have eva****ated or otherwise gone away.
>
> How do you know Mars has "hardly its fair share"? Compared with what?
>
> > Instead this interpretation merely represents the mostly likely
> > culprit, especially since there=EF=BF=BDs no apparent human created
> > representations of our having that moon as of prior to 12,500 BP...
>
> Except there are, but you refuse to acknowledge them. You gladly
> claim that some Paleolithic artifacts depict the sun, athough you
> haven't actually shown us any of your "many examples worth
> interpreting", or told us why you prefer to interpret them as solar
> symbols. But when archaeologists claim that other Paleolithic
> artifacts depict the moon, you reject their claims without good
> reason. (I take it from the newsgroups you've chosen to post to, that
> you haven't actually discussed your hypothesis with an archaeologist,
> like I suggested you should? Much less read a textbook or journal
> about Paleolithic archaeology?)
>
> > In a further stretch of interpretation; Could some of our human
> > species and other complex forms of DNA life have successfully
> > interstellar migrated via such an icy proto-moon?
>
> Oh, let's not go multiplying entities unecessarily. You haven't made
> a case for your first "interpretation", let alone a second!


|