On Jun 25, 10:20 pm, josephus <dogb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> BradGuth wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 8:54 am, Stevep...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Jun 19, 9:24 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> 33% is not
half, but then my math isn't nearly as good as yours.
>
> >> Evidently not .. apollo = 50% of NASS's work to date? 33%?
>
> >>> If it's of replicated science outside of anything DARPA/NASA, as
such
> >>> there's a good chance that it's believable.
> >> Cite.
>
> > Obviously you have no option but to believe whatever your DARPA status
> > quo has scripted for your cultivated mindset to think, or else. Good
> > luck with that. Perhaps your next orchestrated 9/11 or ringworm
> > treatments will not have to involve those of your own kind.
>
> ookay -- troll alert. criticizing the post and belittling the
> critic. Brad is declining. brute force intelligence is not the same
> a knowledge. by evading question of do***entation Brad exhibits the
> delusion that he has answered the question.
Besides DARPA, who the hell are you talking to?
>
> >>> RKA, ESA and JAXA are not independent of the DARPA/NASA thumb (aka
> >>> MIB).
> >> They're more trustworthy?
>
> > Yes, it seems ESA, RKA and JAXA are technically more trustworthy than
> > our NASA, except when they're often used as toilet paper by our
> > DARPA. I'd tend to trust what little China has to offer, as much if
> > not more than our NASA.
>
> there are some rules to be credible.
> 1. show your work.
> 2. accept valid critiques.
> 3. change your claim to match the data.
>
> brad fails all 3 conditions...
You mean our DARPA~NASA and of their Apollo fiasco has failed all
three, and then some.
1) I've shown my work, as well as having asked of others to share
alike.
2) I've accepted valid critics (key word being "valid", because
invalid critics like yourself don't really count, unless I've run out
of toilet paper).
3) I've changed quite a bit of my story since my having need-to-know
learned from certain wizardly bigots of superior nayism like yourself.
Of course, without the likes of yourself, Hitler and a few other
warlords couldn't have gotten very far, as well as Christ wouldn't
have been put on a stick.
- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
|
