On Jul 11, 9:14=A0am, "Michele" <nospammiar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ha scritto nel
messaggionews:35473620-4dc9-42f5-bbea-5=
a2da25c3894@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jul 11, 3:14 am, "Michele" <nospammiar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ha scritto nel
> >
messaggionews:1745ce31-3545-4470-926d-a4aaebd4835f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Jul 10, 3:35 am, "Michele" <nospammiar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > My name is here, but you are not replying to something I wrote.
>
> Actually, I do. I can see your original text in your reply.
>
> >Actually you
> > have snipped everything I wrote, as evidenced below.
>
> You should check whatever you are using because this was not the case.
> But, in case you do have problem with your software, the preserved
> piece from your post is below:
>
> "> > I'd separate the Soviet Jews from the non-Soviet central and
> eastern> > European Jews. Soviet Jews, as has been noted elsewhere in
thi=
s
> > > thread, were assimilating strongly to Russian culture even before
the
> > > Revolution.
>
> "
>
> No. This was written by Randy McDonald. Try reading his message, to
which=
I
> replied, quoting the above. You'll find the first appearance of this
> sentence is in his message, not mine.
>
I see. Unfortunately, in your post his text and your response appeared
in exactly the same format (no extra > or any clear separator) so I
had no obvious reason to go any further backwards.
Anyway, you don't have to take my comments as a personal offense.
> If you want to address something I wrote, this is it:
>
> "- Sorry, but a WWII-less world also means a Nazi-less world. And the
Ger=
man
> Jews were not segregated, and a sizable part of them were assimilating
fa=
st,
> before the Nazis came to power. There was prejudice, but for the
majority=
of
> the Germans it was selective: a traditionally-clad Polish-Jewish
immigran=
t
> street peddler, with his gibberish Yiddish, would be much less welcome
> anywhere than a German-speaking German professional dressed like a
German=
,
> who also happened to be Jewish as to his faith or, even less
im****tantly,=
as
> to his ancestry only."
Actually, I'm not positive that no-WWII is necessarily equal to no-
Nazism. There can be multiple scenarios under which the 3rd Reich
exists for decades without a major military conflict.
Let's say that Hitler is satisfied with getting Austria and Czechia
and not that obsessed with Danzig/Eastern Prussia issue (for example,
there is an agreement on a connecting highway). Or, even better, he
dies in 1939 (say, plane crash or some natural cause) and Goerring (or
whoever would be his successor at this time) is considerably less
bellicose. Then, the German Jews are being persecuted but not the
Polish, Lithuanian, Latvian, Rumanian and Hungarian ones.
|
