The British Revolution
Archibald Maule Ramsay
The Nameless War
"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of
Revolutions, which is not yet finished."
With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl
of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I published
in 1851. A work of astoni****ng detail and insight, much information
for which, he states, was obtained from the records of one Melchior de
Salom, French envoy in England during that period.
The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom
based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions; these
sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in
one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous
rumblings of Calvinism.
Calvin, who came to Geneva from France, where his name was spelt
Cauin, *possibly a French effort to spell Cohen, organized great
numbers of revolutionary orators, not a few of whom were inflicted
upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork for revolution
under a cloak of religious fervour.
*Note. At a B'nai B'rith meeting in Paris re****ted in 'Catholic
Gazette' in Feb 1936 he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.
On both sides of the Tweed these demagogues contracted all
religion into rigid observance of the "Sabbath." To use the words of
Isaac Disraeli,
"The nation was artfully divided into Sabbatarians and Sabbath
breakers."
"Calvin deemed the Sabbath to have been a Jewish ordinance,
limited to the sacred people."
He goes on to say that when these Calvinists held the country in their
power,
"it seemed that religion chiefly consisted of Sabbatarian rigours;
and that a British senate had been transformed into a company of
Hebrew Rabbins":
and later
"In 1650, after the execution of the King, an Act was passed
inflicting penalties for a breach of the Sabbath."
Buckingham, Strafford and Laud are the three chief figures round
the King in these early stages: Men on whose loyalty to himself, the
nation, and the ancient tradition Charles can rely.
Buckingham, the trusted friend of King James I, and of those who
had saved his life at the time of the Gowrie Conspiracy (of ominous
cabalistic associations) was assassinated in the early years of King
Charles' reign under mysterious cir***stances.
Strafford, who had been in his early days inclined to follow the
opposite faction, later left them; and became a staunch and devoted
adherent of the King.
This opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles
and by the time that they were led by Pym and decided to impeach
Strafford. "The King," writes Disraeli, "regarded this faction as his
enemies"; and he states that the head of this faction was the Earl of
Bedford.
Walsh, the eminent Catholic historian, states that a Jew wine
merchant named Roussel was the founder of this family in Tudor times.
With the impeachment and execution of Strafford, the powers behind the
rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy began to reveal themselves,
and their focus, the City of London.
At this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed
mobs of "Operatives" (the medieval equivalent for "workers" no doubt).
Let me quote Disraeli:
"They were said to amount to ten thousand ...
with war-like weapons. It was a militia for insurgency at all
seasons, and might be depended upon for any work of destruction at the
cheapest rate ...
as these sallied forth with daggers and bludgeons (from the city)
the inference is obvious that this train of explosion must have been
long laid."
It must indeed; and we must recollect here, that at this time
Strafford was still unexecuted, and civil war in the minds of none but
of those behind the scenes, who evidently had long since resolved upon
and planned it.
These armed mobs of "workers" intimidated all and sundry,
including both Houses of Parliament and the Palace at critical
moments, exactly on the model employed later by the "Sacred Bands" and
the "Marseillais" in the French Revolution.
Isaac Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between
this and the French Revolution; Notably in his passages on the Press,
"no longer under restraint," and the deluge of revolutionary pamphlets
and leaflets. He writes:
"From 1640 to 1660, about 30,000 appear to have started up."
And later,
"the collection of French revolutionary pamphlets now stands by
the side of the French tracts of the age of Charles I, as abundant in
number and as fierce in passion. . .
Whose hand behind the curtain played the strings . . .
could post up a correct list of 59 commoners, branding them with
the odious title of 'Straffordians or betrayers of their country'."
Whose hand indeed? But Disraeli who knew so much, now discreetly
draws a veil over that iron curtain; and it is left to us to complete
the revelation.
To do so we must turn to such other works as the Jewish
Encyclopedia, Sombart's work, The Jews and Modern Capitalism, and
others. From these we learn that Cromwell, the chief figure of the
revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew financiers in
Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben
Israel; whilst Fernandez Carvajal, "The Great Jew" as he was called,
was the chief contractor of the New Model Army.
In The Jews in England we read:
"1643 brought a large contingent of Jews to England, their
rallying point was the house of the ****tuguese Ambassador De Souza, a
Marano (secret Jew). Prominent among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a
great financier and army contractor."
In January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five
members had set in violent motion the armed gangs of "Operatives"
already mentioned, from the city. Revolutionary pamphlets were
broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli tells us:
"Bearing the ominous insurrectionary cry of 'To your tents, O
Israel'."
Shortly after this the King and the Royal Family left the Palace
of Whitehall.
The five members with armed mobs and banners accompanying them,
were given a triumphal return to Westminster. The stage was now set
for the advent of Carvajal and his Jews and the rise of their creature
Cromwell.
The scene now changes. The Civil War has taken its course. The
year is 1647: Naseby has been won and lost. The King is virtually a
prisoner, while treated as an honoured guest at Holmby House.
According to a letter published in Plain English (a weekly review
published by the North British Publi****ng Co. and edited by the late
Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd September, 1921:
"The Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer
period than they have perhaps suspected.
My friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently
sent me a letter containing two extracts from the Synagogue at
Mulheim. The volume in which they are contained was lost at some
period during the Napoleonic Wars, and has recently come into Mr. van
Valckert's possession.
It is written in German, and contains extracts of letters
sent and received by the authorities of the Mulheim Synagogue. The
first entry he sends me is of a letter received:
16th June, 1647
From O.C. (i.e. Oliver Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.
In return for financial sup****t will advocate admission
of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living.
Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for
which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be
assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for
procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.
In reply was dispatched the following:
12th July, 1647
To O.C. by E. Pratt.
Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and
Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given
op****tunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution
possible. The sup****t will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
until trial commences."
With this information now at our disposal, the subsequent moves
on the part of the regicides stand out with a new clearness. On 4th
June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on secret orders from Cromwell
himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to General-in-Chief
Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked revolutionary
troopers, and seized the King. According to Disraeli,
"The plan was arranged on May 30th at a secret meeting held at
Cromwell's house, though later Cromwell pretending that it was without
his concurrence."
This move coincided with a sudden development in the army; the
rise of the 'Levelers" and "Rationalists." Their doctrines were those
of the French revolutionaries; in fact, what we know today as
Communism. These were the regicides, who four times "purged"
Parliament, till there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like
themselves, known later as the Rump.
To return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June,
1647, and its cunning suggestion that attempted escape should be used
as a pretext for execution. Just such an event took place, on 12th
November of that year. Hollis and Ludlow consider the flight as a
stratagem of Cromwell's. Isaac Disraeli states:
"Contem****ary historians have decided that the King from the day
of his de****tation from Holmby to his escape to the Isle of Wight was
throughout the dupe of Cromwell."
Little more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the
orders from the Synagogue, and now it only remained to stage the mock
trial.
Maneuvering for position continued for some time. And it became
apparent that the House of Commons, even in their partially "purged"
condition, were in favour of coming to an agreement with the King. On
5th December, 1648, the House sat all night; and finally carried the
question, "That the King's concessions were satisfactory to a
settlement."
Should such agreement have been reached, of course, Cromwell
would not have received the large sums of money which he was hoping to
get from the Jews. He struck again. On the night of December 6th,
Colonel Pryde, on his instructions, carried out the last and most
famous "purge" of the House of Commons, known as "Pryde's Purge."
On 4th January, the Communist remnant of 50 members, the Rump,
invested themselves with "the supreme authority."
On 9th January "a High Court of Justice" to try the King was
proclaimed. Two-thirds of its members were Levelers from the Army.
Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell:
"First, the King can be tried by no court. Second, no man can be
tried by this court."
So writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his Charles and Cromwell; and he
adds a fini****ng touch to the effect that
"no English lawyer could be found to draw up the charge, which was
eventually entrusted to an accommodating alien, Isaac Dorislaus."
Needless to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of
alien as Carvajal and Manasseh Ben Israel and the other financiers who
paid the "Protector" his blood money.
The Jews were once again permitted to land freely in England in
spite of strong protests by the sub-committee of the Council of State,
which declared that they would be a grave menace to the State and the
Christian religion. Perhaps it is due to their protests that the
actual act of banishment has never to this day been repealed.
"The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding
one ...
From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases
of revolution." Isaac Disraeli
There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in
France.
In 1897 a further im****tant clue to these mysterious happenings
fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion. In that do***ent we read this remarkable sentence:
"Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation
are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our
hands."[Protocol No.3]
The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,
"Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which
are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."
The difficult problem of the subjugation of both Kingdoms was
still however unsolved. Scotland was Royalist before everything else;
and she had proclaimed Charles II King. Cromwell's armies marched
round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers, dispensing Judaic
barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover
accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and
slowly but steadily the feeling in England began to come round to the
Scottish point of view.
Finally upon the death of Cromwell, all Britain welcomed the
King's restoration to the throne of England.
In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an im****tant
difference between the Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one
to which he returned as King. The enemies of King****p were entrenched
within his kingdom now, and as soon as the stage should be set for
renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once more
persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church,
the next attack would develop.
The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances
of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly
ensconced within.
Charles evidently had no consciousness of the Jewish problem or
plans, or the menace they held for his peoples. The wisdom and
experience of Edward I had become lost in the centuries of segregation
from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of the danger to the Crown in
placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a "Popish Plot" cry
he did retain.
With James II's accession, the crisis could not be long delayed.
The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and propaganda was soon in full
swing against him, and it is no surprise to find that many of the
vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. This country was
now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and
considerable comings and goings took place during these years.
Stories were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had
joined those who plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit
them, or take any action till news came that the expedition against
himself was actually under way.
The chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial
juncture was John Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is
interesting to read in the Jewish Encyclopedia that this Duke for many
years received not less than 6,000 pounds a year from the Dutch Jew
Solomon Medina.
The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a
few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the
setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the
National Debt.
This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal
prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold;
and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on
the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some
ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously
obtain.
From that time economic machinery was set in motion which
ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which
the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the
real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples.
[Note: Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by
gold. He eluded the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money
Masters, therefore "Germany must be destroyed!" and Adolf Hitler
vilified down through ages so the uninformed will DEMAND their
government return to the gold standard. -- jackie]
The political and economic union of England and Scotland was
shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and
in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main
objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and
to force upon her, too, responsibility for the "National Debt."
The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain.
The danger was that the members of the new joint Parliament would
sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this
state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party system
was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and
enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-
established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own
policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient sup****t from
their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.
Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of
the amount deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be
legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in
gold could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to
the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.
The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every
hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process
must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become
millionaires; those who own and work the land, the Englishman and the
Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably till
now, when it is nearly completed.
It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as
helping the poor by mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing
of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the
landed cl*****, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting
by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/01.The.British.Revolution.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote the true history of events leading up to
the Second World War. For this he was imprisoned for several years.
Read his book The Nameless War online or download it as PDF.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/00.Introduction.htm
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf
CONTENTS
1. The British Revolution
2. The French Revolution
3. The Russian Revolution
4. Development of Revolutionary Technique
5. Germany Bells The Cat
6. 1933: Jewry Declares War
7. "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
8. Dunkirk and After
9. The Shape of Things to Come
10. President Roosevelt's Role
11. Regulation 18b
12. Who Dares?
13. Epilogue
14. Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
15. Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest
The French Revolution
Archibald Maule Ramsay
The Nameless War
The French Revolution of 1789 was the most startling event in the
history of Europe since the fall of Rome.
A new phenomenon then appeared before the world. Never before had
a mob apparently organized successful revolution against all other
cl***** in the state, under high sounding, but quite nonsensical
slogans, and with methods bearing not a trace of the principles
enshrined in those slogans.
Never before had any one section of any nation conquered all
other sections; and still less swept away every feature of the
national life and tradition, from King, religion, nobles, clergy,
constitution, flag, calendar, and place names, to coinage.
Such a phenomenon merits the closest attention; especially in
view of the fact that it has been followed by identical outbreaks in
many countries.
The main discovery that such an examination will reveal is this
fact:
the revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It
was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which
had been France.
This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in
high places in the Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter
Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.
We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they
were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals;
they were, of course, Jews.
Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the
name of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us
for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
"We were the first to cry among the m***** of the people the words
'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew
down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the
well-being of the world.
The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they
could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be
freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and
Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No.
1.
With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a
master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The
somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the
screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a
concerted and connected human drama.
When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain
of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of
1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense
of reality.
"Revolution is a blow struck at a paralytic."
Even so, however, it must be obvious that immense organization,
and vast resources, as well as cunning and secrecy far above the
ordinary are necessary for its successful preparation.
It is amazing indeed that people should suppose that "mobs" or
"the people" ever have, or ever could, undertake such a complicated
and costly operation. No mistake more-over could be more dangerous;
for it will result in total inability to recognize the true
significance of events, or the source and focus of a revolutionary
movement.
The process or organizing revolution is seen to be firstly the
infliction of paralysis; and secondly, the striking of the blow or
blows.
It is for the first process, the production of paralysis, that
the secrecy is essential. Its outward signs are debt, loss of
publicity control, and the existence of alien-influenced secret
organizations in the doomed state.
Debt, particularly international debt, is the first and over-
mastering grip. Through it men in high places are suborned, and alien
powers and influences are introduced into the body politic. When the
debt grip has been firmly established, control of every form of
publicity and political activity soon follows, together with a full
grip on industrialists.
The stage for the revolutionary blow is then set. The grip of the
right hand of finance established the paralysis; while it is the
revolutionary left that holds the dagger and deals the fatal blow.
Moral corruption facilitates the whole process.
By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France.
The world's big financiers were firmly established.
"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver
stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly
France."
So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on
page 38:
"A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic
structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and
had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands,
crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced,
namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had been given."
The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no
means insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's
advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real
wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted.
As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after
another, who either could not or would not break with the system
imposed by the international usurers.
Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only
grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or
silver, neither of which France produced.
And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these
manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside
down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions
upon millions of usurious loans?
The late Lady Queensborough, in her im****tant work Occult
Theocracy gives us certain outstanding names, taking her facts from
L'Anti-Semitisme by the Jew Bernard Lazare, 1894.
In London she gives the names of Benjamin Goldsmid and his
brother Abraham Goldsmid, Moses Mocatta their partner, and his nephew
Sir Moses Montifiore, as being directly concerned in financing the
French Revolution, along with Daniel Itsig of Berlin and his son-in-
law David Friedlander, and Herz Cerfbeer of Alsace. These names recall
the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it,
for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so
as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."
And Again:-
"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers
who . . . come begging with outstretched palm."
No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France.
Sir Walter Scott in his Life of Napoleon, Vol. 1, thus describes the
situation:-
"These financiers used the government as bankrupt prodigals are
treated by usurious moneylenders, who feeding their extravagance with
the one hand, with the other wring out of their ruined fortunes the
most unreasonable recompenses for their advances.
By a long succession of these ruinous loans, and the various
rights granted to guarantee them, the whole finances of France were
brought to total confusion."
King Louis' chief finance minister during these last years of
growing confusion was Necker, "a Swiss" of German extraction, son of a
German professor of whom McNair Wilson writes:
"Necker had forced his way into the King's Treasury as a
representative of the debt system owning allegiance to that system."
We can easily imagine what policy that allegiance inspired in
Necker; and when we add to this the fact that his previous record was
that of a daring and unscrupulous speculator, we can understand why
the national finances of France under his baneful aegis rapidly
worsened, so that after four years of his manipulations, the
unfortunate King's government had contracted an additional and far
more serious debt of 170,000,000 pounds.
By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England.
By 1771 the movement had attained such pro****tions that Phillipe Duc
de Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of
freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its
early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were
ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.
The Duc d'Orleans was not one of these latter. Though a man of
little principle, and an extravagant, vain and ambitious libertine, he
had no motives beyond the ousting of the King, and the establi****ng of
a democratic monarchy with himself as that monarch. Having in addition
but little intelligence, he made the ideal stalking horse for the
first and most moderate stage of revolution, and a willing tool of men
whom he probably scarcely knew; and who sent him to the guillotine
soon after his base and ignominious role had been played.
The Marquis de Mirabeau who succeeded him as the leading figure
of the Revolution was cast in much the same role. He was a much abler
man than d'Orleans, but so foul a libertine that he was shunned by all
his own class, and imprisoned more than once at the instance of his
own father.
He is known to have been financed by Moses Mendelssohn, head of
the Jewish Illuminati, and to have been more in the company of the
Jewess Mrs. Herz than was her husband. He was not only an early figure-
head in French Freemasonry in the respectable years, but introduced
Illuminism into France.
[Note: Moses Mendelssohn is the 'learned Jew' who is quoted as saying
that: "Judaism is not a religion. It is a law religionized".
To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political
program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". -
jackie]
This Illuminism was a secret revolutionary society behind
freemasonry. The Illuminati penetrated into all the lodges of Grand
Orient Freemasonry, and were backed and organized by cabalistic Jews.
It is interesting to note that the Duc D'Orleans and Talleyrand
were both initiated into Illuminism by Mirabeau shortly after the
latter had introduced it into France, from Frankfurt, where its
headquarters had been established in 1782 under Adam Weishaupt.
In 1785 there happened a strange event, which makes it seem as
though the heavenly powers themselves made a last moment attempt to
warn France and Europe against these massing powers of evil:
Lightning struck dead a messenger of the Illuminati at Ratisbon.
The police found on the body papers dealing with plans for world
revolution.
Thereupon the Bavarian Government had the headquarters of the
Illuminati searched, and much further evidence was discovered.
French authorities were informed, but the process of paralysis was
too far advanced, and no action resulted.
By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France
affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international
revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.
Thus we get Jewish Illuminism under Moses Mendelssohn and Masonic
Illuminism under Weishaupt established as the inner controls of a
strong secret organization covering the whole of France.
Under the Illuminati worked Grand Orient Freemasonry, and under
that again the Blue, or National, Masonry had operated until it was
converted over-night into Grand Orient Masonry by Phillipe d'Orleans
in 1773. Little did Egalite suspect the satanic powers that he was
invoking, when he took that action, and satanic they certainly were.
The name Lucifer means "Light Bearer"; and Illuminati those who were
lit by that light.
By the time the Estates General met at Versailles on 5th May,
1789, the paralysis of the executive authority by the secret
organizations was complete.
Paralysis by control of public opinion and publicity was well
advanced by then also.
This was the manner of its accomplishment.
By 1780 d'Orleans' entire income of 800,000 livres, thanks to his
reckless gambling and extravagance, was mortgaged to the moneylenders.
In 1781, in return for accommodation, he signed papers handing
over his palace, estates, and house the Palais Royal, to his
creditors, with powers to form there a centre of politics, printing,
pamphleteering, gambling, lectures, brothels, wine-shops, theatres,
art galleries, athletics, and any other uses, which subsequently took
the form of every variety of public debauchery.
In fact, Egalite's financial masters used his name and property
to install a colossal organism for publicity and corruption, which
appealed to every lowest instinct in human nature; and deluged the
enormous crowds so gathered with the filthy, defamatory and
revolutionary output of its printing presses and debating clubs.
As Scudder writes in A Prince of the Blood:
"It gave the police more to do than all the other parts of the
city."
It is interesting to note that the general manager installed by
the creditors at the Palais royal was one de Laclos, a political
adventurer of alien origin, author of Liaisons Dangereuses, and other
****ographic works, who was said "to study the politics of love
because of his love for politics."
This steady stream of corruption and destructive propaganda was
linked with a series of systematic personal attacks of the vilest and
most unscrupulous nature upon any public characters whom the Jacobins
thought likely to stand in their way. This process was known as
"L'infamie."
Marie Antoinette herself was one of the chief targets for this
typically Jewish form of attack. No lie or abuse was too vile to level
at her. More intelligent, alert, and vigorous than the weak and
indolent Louis, Marie Antoinette presented a considerable obstacle to
the revolution. She had, more-over, received many warnings regarding
freemasonry from her sister in Austria; and no doubt was by this time
more awake to its significance than when she had written to her sister
some years previously:
"I believe that as far as France is concerned, you worry too much
about freemasonry. Here it is far from having the significance that it
may have elsewhere in Europe. Here everything is open and one knows
all. Then where could the danger be?
One might well be worried if it were a question of a political
secret society. But on the contrary the government lets it spread, and
it is only that which it seems, an association the objects of which
are union and charity.
One dines, one sings, one talks, which has given the King occasion
to say that people who drink and sing are not suspect of organizing
plots. Nor is it a society of atheists, for we are told God is on the
lips of all. They are very charitable. They bring up the children of
their poor and dead members. They endow their daughters. What harm is
there in all that?"
What harm indeed if these blameless pretensions masked no darker
designs? Doubtless the agents of Weishaupt and Mendelssohn re****ted on
to them the contents of the Queen's letter; and we can imagine them
shaking with laughter, and rubbing their hands in satisfaction; hands
that were itching to destroy the very life of France and her Queen;
and which at the appropriate hour would give the signal that would
convert secret conspiracy into the "massacres of September" and the
blood baths of the guillotine.
In order to further the campaign of calumny against the Queen, an
elaborate hoax was arranged at the time, when the financiers and grain
speculators were deliberately creating conditions of poverty and
hunger in Paris.
A diamond necklace valued at nearly a quarter of a million was
ordered at the Court jewellers in the Queen's name by an agent of the
Jacobins. The unfortunate Queen knew nothing of this affair until the
necklace was brought round to her for acceptance, when she naturally
disclaimed anything to do with the matter, pointing out that she would
consider it wrong to order such a thing when France was in so bad a
financial way.
The printing presses of the Palais Royal, however, turned full
blast on to the subject; and every kind of criticism leveled at the
Queen.
A further scandal was then engineered for the presses. Some
prostitute from the Palais Royal was engaged to disguise herself as
the Queen; and by the forged letter the Cardinal Prince de Rohan was
induced to meet the supposed Queen about midnight at the Palais Royal,
supposing he was being asked for advice and help by the Queen on the
subject of the necklace.
This event, needless to say, was immediately re****ted to the
printing presses and pamphleteers, who started a further campaign
containing the foulest innuendoes that could be imagined concerning
the whole affair. The moving spirit behind the scene was Cagliostro,
alias Joseph Balsamo, a Jew from Palermo, a doctor of the cabalistic
art, and a member of the Illuminati, into which he was initiated at
Frankfurt by Weishaupt in 1774.
When the necklace had finally served its purpose, it was sent
over to London, where most of the stones were retained by the Jew
Eliason. Attacks of a similar nature were directed against many other
decent people, who resisted the influence of the Jacobin clubs. After
eight years of this work the process of paralysis by mastery of
publicity was complete.
In every respect therefore by 1789, when the financiers forced
the King to summon the Estates General, the first ****tion of their
plans for revolution (i.e. paralysis) were accomplished. It now only
remained to strike the blow or series of blows, which were to rob
France of her throne, her church, her constitution, her nobles, her
clergy, her gentry, her bourgeoisie, her traditions, and her culture;
leaving in their place, when the guillotine's work was done, citizen
hewers of wood and drawers of water under an alien financial
dictator****p.
From 1789 onwards a succession of revolutionary acts were set in
motion; each more violent than the one preceding it; each unmasking
fresh demands and more violent and revolutionary leaders. In their
turn each of these leaders, a puppet only of the real powers behind
the revolution, is set aside; and his head rolls into the basket to
join those of his victims of yesterday.
Phillipe Egalite, Duc d'Orleans, was used to prepare the ground
for the revolution; to protect with his name and influence the infancy
of the revolutionary club; to popularize freemasonry and the Palais
Royal; and to sponsor such acts as the march of the women to
Versailles.
The "women" on this occasion were mostly men in disguise.
d'Orleans was under the impression that the King and Queen would be
assassinated by this mob, and himself proclaimed a democratic King.
The real planners of the march, however, had other schemes in view.
One main objective was to secure the removal of the royal family
to Paris, where they would be clear of protection from the army, and
under the power of the Commune or Paris County Council in which the
Jacobins were supreme.
They continued to make use of Egalite right up to the time of the
vote on the King's life, when he crowned his sordid career by leading
the open vote in voting for the death of his cousin. His masters
thereafter had no further use for his services; and he very shortly
followed his cousin to the guillotine amidst the execrations of all
cl*****.
Mirabeau played a similar role to that of Egalite. He had
intended that the revolution should cease with the setting up of Louis
as a democratic monarch with himself as chief adviser. He had no
desire to see violence done to the King. On the contrary, in the last
days before he died mysteriously by poison, he exerted all his efforts
to get the King removed from Paris, and placed in charge of loyal
generals still commanding his army.
He was the last of the moderates and monarchists to dominate the
Jacobin club of Paris; that bloodthirsty focus of revolution, which
had materialized out of the secret clubs of the Orient Masons and
Illuminati. It was Mirabeau's voice, loud and resonant, that kept in
check the growing rage of the murderous fanatics who swarmed therein.
There is no doubt that he perceived at last the true nature and
strength of the beast, which he had worked so long and so
industriously to unchain. In his last attempt to save the royal family
by getting them out of Paris, he actually succeeded in shouting down
all opposition in the Jacobin club. That evening he died by a sudden
and violent illness; and, as the author of The Diamond Necklace
writes:
"Louis was not ignorant that Mirabeau had been poisoned."
Thus, like Phillipe Egalite, and later Danton and Robes Pierre,
Mirabeau too was removed from the stage when his role had been played.
We are reminded of the passage in Number 15 of the Protocols of Zion:
"We execute masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can
ever have a suspicion of it."
And again:
"In this way we shall proceed with those goy masons who know too
much."
As Mr E. Scudder writes in his Life of Mirabeau:
"He died at a moment when the revolution might still have been
checked."
The figure of Lafayette occupies the stage on several im****tant
occasions during these first revolutionary stages. He was one of those
simple freemasons, who are borne they know not wither, in a ****p they
have not fully explored, and by currents concerning which they are
totally ignorant.
While a popular figure with the revolutionary crowds, he very
severely handled several incipient outbreaks of revolutionary
violence, notably in the march of the women to Versailles, during the
attack on the Tuilleries, and at the Champs de Mars. He, too, desired
the establishment of a democratic monarchy, and would countenance no
threat to the King even from Phillipe Egalite, whom he treated with
the utmost hostility during and after the march of the women to
Versailles, believing on that occasion that Egalite intended the
assassination of the King, and the usurpation of the Crown.
He evidently became an obstacle to the powers behind the
revolution, and was packed off to a war against Austria, which the
Assembly forced Louis to declare. Once he did dash back to Paris in an
effort to save the King; but he was packed off again to the war.
Mirabeau's death followed, and Louis' fate was sealed.
The wild figures of Danton, Marat, Robes Pierre, and the fanatics
of the Jacobin club now dominated the scene.
In September of 1792 were perpetrated the terrible "September
massacres"; 8,000 persons being murdered in the prisons of Paris
alone, and many more over the country.
It should be noted here, that these victims were arrested and
held till the time of the massacre in the prisons by one Manuel,
Procurer of the Commune. Sir Walter Scott evidently understood much
concerning the influences which were at work behind the scenes. In his
Life of Napoleon, Vol. 2, he writes on page 30:
"The demand of the Communaute de Paris,* now the Sanhedrin of the
Jacobins, was, of course, for blood."
[*The Paris County Council, equivalent to the L.C.C. in London.]
Again, on page 56 he writes:
"The power of the Jacobins was irresistible in Paris, where Robes
Pierre, Danton and Marat shared the high places in the synagogue."
Writing of the Commune, Sir Walter Scott states in the same work:
"The principal leaders of the Commune seem to have been
foreigners."
Some of the names of these "foreigners" are worthy of note:
There was Chlodero de Laclos, manager of the Palais Royal,
said to be of Spanish origin.
There was Manuel, the Procurer of the Commune, already
mentioned. He it was who started the attack upon royalty in the
Convention, which culminated with the execution of Louis and Marie
Antoinette.
There was David the painter, a leading member of the
Committee of Public Security, which "tried" the victims. His voice was
always raised calling for death. Sir Walter Scott writes that this
fiend used to preface his "bloody work of the day with the
professional phrase, 'let us grind enough of the Red'." David it was
who inaugurated the Cult of the Supreme being; and organized
"the conducting of this heathen mummery, which was substituted
for every external sign of rational devotion." (Sir Walter Scott, Life
of Napoleon, Vol. 2.)
There were Reubel and Gohir, two of the five "Directors," who
with a Council of Elders became the government after the fall of Robes
Pierre, being known as the Directoire.
The terms "Directors" and "Elders" are, of course,
characteristically Jewish.
One other observation should be made here; it is that this
im****tant work by Sir Walter Scott in 9 volumes, revealing so much of
the real truth, is practically unknown, is never reprinted with his
other works, and is almost unobtainable.
Those familiar with Jewish technique will appreciate the full
significance of this fact; and the added im****tance it lends to Sir
Walter Scott's evidence regarding the powers behind the French
Revolution.
To return to the scene in Paris. Robes Pierre now remains alone,
and apparently master of the scenes; but this again was only
appearance. Let us turn to the Life of Robes Pierre, by one G. Renier,
who writes as though Jewish secrets were at his disposal. He writes:
"From April to July 1794 (the fall of Robes Pierre) the terror was
at its height. It was never the dictator****p of a single man, least of
all Robes Pierre. Some 20 men (the Committees of Public Safety and of
General Security) shared the power."
To quote Mr. Renier again:
"On the 28th July, 1794," "Robes Pierre made a long speech before
the Convention . . . a philippic against ultra-terrorists. . .
uttering vague general accusations.
'I dare not name them at this moment and in this place. I
cannot bring myself entirely to tear asunder the veil that covers this
profound mystery of iniquity. But I can affirm most positively that
among the authors of this plot are the agents of that system of
corruption and extravagance, the most powerful of all the means
invented by foreigners for the undoing of the Republic; I mean the
impure apostles of atheism, and the immorality that is at its base'."
Mr Renier continues with all a Jew's satisfaction:
"Had he not spoken these words he might still have triumphed!"
In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and
crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes
Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was
getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth
would be out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early
on the following day dragged to the guillotine.
Again let us recall Protocol 15:
"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."
Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed
by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet
that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis
similar to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he
had financed the Civil War.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/02.The.French.Revolution.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote the true history of events leading up to
the Second World War. For this he was imprisoned for several years.
Read his book The Nameless War online or download it as PDF.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/00.Introduction.htm
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf
CONTENTS
1. The British Revolution
2. The French Revolution
3. The Russian Revolution
4. Development of Revolutionary Technique
5. Germany Bells The Cat
6. 1933: Jewry Declares War
7. "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
8. Dunkirk and After
9. The Shape of Things to Come
10. President Roosevelt's Role
11. Regulation 18b
12. Who Dares?
13. Epilogue
14. Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
15. Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest
The Russian Revolution
Archibald Maule Ramsay
The Nameless War
Monsieur Francois Coty, the celebrated scent manufacturer, wrote in
Figaro on 20th February, 1932:
"The subsidies granted to the Nihilists at this period (1905-1917)
by Jacob Schiff, of Kuhn Loeb and Co., New York, were no longer acts
of isolated generosity. A veritable Russian terrorist organization had
been set up at his expense. It covered Russia with its emissaries."
This creation of terrorist formations by Jews within a country
marked down for revolution, whether they be called Nihilists or as in
France in 1789, "Sacred Bands," or "Marseillais"; or "Operatives," as
in the Britain of Charles I, now stands revealed as standard
technique.
Jacob Schiff also financed Japan in her war against Russia
1904-5, as we learn from the Jewish Encyclopedia.
This war was immediately followed by an attempt at revolution on
a considerable scale in Russia, which, however, proved abortive. The
next attempt, during the Great War, met with complete success.
On the 3rd January, 1906, the Russian Foreign Minister supplied
to Emperor Nicholas II a re****t on this revolutionary outbreak, which,
as revealed in the American Hebrew of July 13th, 1918, contained the
following passages:
"The events which took place in Russia in 1905 . . . plainly
indicate that the revolutionary movement . . . has a definite
international character . . .
the revolutionaries possess great quantities of arms im****ted from
abroad and very considerable financial means . . .
one is bound to conclude that there are foreign capitalists'
organizations interested in sup****ting our revolutionary movement. If
we add to the above that, as has been proved beyond any doubt, a very
considerable part is played by Jews . . .
as ring-leaders in other organizations as well as their own . . .
always the most bellicose element of the revolution . . .
we may feel entitled to assume that the above-mentioned foreign
sup****t of the Russian revolutionary movement comes from Jewish
capitalist circles."
The assumption in the foregoing re****t was indeed well justified.
It was to be confirmed by an even more im****tant official do***ent
penned at the height of the revolution itself, in 1918, by Mr.
Oudendyke, the representative of the Netherlands Government in St.
Petersburg, who was in charge of British interests in Russia after the
liquidation of our Embassy by the bolsheviks.
So im****tant indeed was this re****t of Mr. Oudendyke's held to be
by Mr. Balfour, to whom it was addressed, that it was set out in a
British government white paper on bolshevism issued in April 1919.
(Russia No. 1.)
In it I have read the following passage: [Emphasis by author]
"I consider that the immediate suppression of bolshevism is the
greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which
is still raging, and unless bolshevism is nipped in the bud
immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe,
and the whole world, as it is organized and worked by Jews, who have
no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends
the existing order of things."
A still clearer light is thrown on these happenings by an article
written on 12th April, 1919, in a paper called The Communist, at
Kharkov, by one M. Cohen:
"The great Russian revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands
of Jews. There are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as
privates are concerned, but in the Committees, and in the Soviet
organization as Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the m*****.
The symbol of Jewry has become the symbol of the Russian
proletariat, which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the five-
pointed star, which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and
Jewry."
Mr. Fahey, in his im****tant and authenticated work, The Rulers of
Russia, is more specific, stating that in 1917 of the 52 persons who
took over the direction in Russia, all but Lenin were Jews.
[Mr. Fahey must somehow have missed the fact that Lenin himself WAS a
Jew. That would mean then that ALL who took over the direction in
Russia were Jews. - jackie]
So thorough was the mass liquidation of all but hewers of wood
and drawers of water in Russia, that this Jewish grip remained
unaltered. Dr. Fahey tells us that in 1935 the Central Executive of
the Third international, which ruled Russia
"consisted of 59 men, of which 56 were Jews. The other three,
including Stalin, were married to Jewesses. Of 17 principal Soviet
ambassadors, 4 were Jews." (Rulers of Russia, pages 8 and 9.)
The Rev. George Simons, who was Superintendent of the Methodist
Episcopal Church in St. Petersburg from 1907 to October 1918, appeared
before a Committee of the United States Senate on the 12th February,
1919, and gave them a re****t of his personal knowledge of the
happenings in Russia up to the time he left. Dr. Fahey quotes him as
saying during this evidence:
"In December, 1918, out of 388 members of the revolutionary
government, only 16 happened to be real Russians; all the rest were
Jews with the exception of one U.S. Negro. Two hundred and sixty-five
of the Jews come from the Lower East Side of New York."
Such has been the condition of affairs in the U.S.S.R. from that
day to this.
Though a number of Jews were liquidated in the so-called "Moscow
Purge," this affected the situation in no way. It merely signified
that one Jewish faction had triumphed over, and liquidated, another.
There has never been anything in the nature of a Gentile revolt
against the Jewish domination.
The fact that some Jews were liquidated by winning factions
behind the iron curtain could be used to deceive the world outside
into thinking that this was the result of an anti-semitic revolt, and
from time to time a hoax of this kind has been systematically
propaganded.
As world opinion gradually turned hostile to the U.S.S.R.
im****tant Jews began to fear that this feeling, combined with a
gradual realization that bolshevism is Jewish, might have unpleasant
reactions for them.
About 1945, therefore, a further powerful campaign was organized
from influential Jewish circles, notably in the U.S.A., to put out the
story once again that Russia had turned on the Jews. They evidently
failed, however, to advise their lesser brethren of this move; and
indignant and informed denials were soon forthcoming.
A journal called Bulletin, the organ of the Glasgow Discussion
Group, wrote in June 1945:
"Such rubbish as is now being spread as to the growth of anti-
Semitism in Russia is nothing but malicious lies and pure invention."
On 1st February, 1949, the Daily Worker carried an article in
which a Mr. Parker gave a few names and figures of Jews in high office
in the U.S.S.R., from which he had evidently recently returned, for he
wrote:
"I never heard a breath of criticism over this state of
affairs. . .
anti-Semitism would render a Soviet official liable to prosecution
in the same way that a private citizen may be brought before the
courts for anti-Semitism."
On the 10th November, 1949, the Daily Worker, that constant and
burning champion of the Jews, printed an article by Mr D. Kartun,
entitled "Stamping Out Anti-Semitism," which shows the complete Jewish
control behind the iron curtain when he writes:
"In Poland and the other people's democracies anti-Semitism in
word or deed is most heavily punished."
Between 1945 and 1949 the propaganda to convince Gentiles outside
the iron curtain, that within that area anti-Semitism was rampant, and
the Jews driven from high office everywhere was energetically pursued.
It began to be believed by quite a number of people, who should have
known better; so much so, that in the autumn of the latter year I
thought it worth while to get out a list showing the number of vital
positions held by Jews behind the iron curtain. Here is an extract
from those lists.
U.S.S.R.:
Premier Stalin Married to a Jewess
Vice-Premier Kaganovitch Jew
Ministry of State Control Mekhlis Jew
Military & Naval Construction Ginsburg Jew
Minister Cominform Organ Yudin Jew
Chief Publicist Abroad for U.S.S.R. Ilya Eherenburg Jew
Ministry of Building Enterprises Machinery Yudin Jew
Foreign Minister Molotoff Married to a Jewess
POLAND:
Virtual Ruler Jacob Bergman Jew
Public Prosecutor T. Cyprian Jew
O.C. Youth Movements Dr. Braniewsky Jew
HUNGARY:
Virtual Ruler Mathias Rakosi Jew
ROUMANIA:
Virtual Ruler Anna Pauker Jewess (Since removed for "deviationism"
but replaced by another Jew.)
YUGOSLAVIA:
Virtual Ruler Moishe Pyjede Jew
[Note: "Kagan" or 'Khagan' is the Khazarian word for 'King'. More than
90% of Jews today are not Semitic, nor are their ancestors. They are
of the Turko-Mongolian tribe of Khazars, whose Kagan adopted Talmudism
around 740 A.D.]
In May 1949, the Daily Worker, which is, of course,
consistently and ardently pro-Jewish, printed an article by Mr A.
Rothstein praising the U.S.S.R. to the skies; and about the same time
another article on similar lines about the paradise behind the iron
curtain by Mr Sam Aronvitch.
On the 10th November the same paper printed an article in which
D. Kartun, writing of the "People's Democracies" and the stamping out
of anti-Semitism there, wrote:
"No one could dream of making an anti-semitic speech or writing an
anti-semitic article in any of these countries. If they did their jail
sentence would be both immediate and lengthy."
In the last few years we have been supplied with further dramatic
proof of the vital inter-relation between Jews and the U.S.S.R.
From the Canadian spy trials, which focused the spotlight on atom
spying for the U.S.S.R., with the conviction and imprisonment of Frank
Rosenberg (alias Rose), the Canadian Jew Communist Member of
Parliament, and several Jews, to the conviction and imprisonment of
many others of the same gang in Britain and the U.S.A., including
****hs, Professor Weinbaum, Judith Coplon, Harry Gold, David
Greenglass, Julius Rosenberg, Miriam Moskewitz, Abraham Brothanz, and
Raymond Boyer, who -- though a Gentile by birth -- married a Jewess and,
I believe, adopted the Jewish creed on that occasion.
Finally, we had the flight to the U.S.S.R. with atom secrets also
of the Jew Professor Pontecorvo, who had been working in close
association with ****hs.
No doubt we shall continue to be regaled with plausible stories
proving that Russia has gone anti-semitic; but it is not hard to
realise that such a Jewish grip backed by the most elaborate spy and
liquidation squads known to man, would cause a convulsion which would
shake the world before its grip could be broken.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/03.The.Russian.Revolution.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archibald Maule Ramsay wrote the true history of events leading up to
the Second World War. For this he was imprisoned for several years.
Read his book The Nameless War online or download it as PDF.
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War/00.Introduction.htm
http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archibald.Maule.Ramsay/The.Nameless.War.pdf
CONTENTS
1. The British Revolution
2. The French Revolution
3. The Russian Revolution
4. Development of Revolutionary Technique
5. Germany Bells The Cat
6. 1933: Jewry Declares War
7. "Phoney War" Ended by Civilian Bombing
8. Dunkirk and After
9. The Shape of Things to Come
10. President Roosevelt's Role
11. Regulation 18b
12. Who Dares?
13. Epilogue
14. Capt. Ramsay's Statement From Prison to Parliament
15. Particulars - Reasons Given For Arrest
|
