Re: #15 what is the journalistic practice of letting in other voices

Marshall wrote:
> > Is it fair to bring in Jesse Hughes who knows little to none of
> > physics on a discussion story of the Atom Totality?
>
> I have yet to find a thread that isn't improved by the
> presence of Jesse Hughes.
>
>
> Marshall

He is mostly a sour old man, who was never able to give any new idea
to the intellectual community. This sourness then takes its toll on
those
who do set forth and offer new ideas. It is called envy.

Jesse is in philosophy, not physics not math and is totally incapable
of passing
judgement on any of my new ideas. And for him to occupy a news story
of
Archimedes Plutonium and Atom Totality is an injustice to me.

As a philosopher he must have trespassed on the Euclid Infinitude of
Primes proof
and as a professor of philosophy is required to be able to do and
understand that proof.

I corrected that proof for which a list of prominent mathematicians
were not able to
recognize that they could not even do a valid Euclid Infinitude of
Primes proof.

Jesse should have congratulated me for recognizing the blunder and
giving a true
and valid Euclid IP. Instead, in his sourness, he dismisses everything
I say and
everything I do.

He is a sour and bitter academician and in my estimation should not
even be
in education because his sourness rubs off. When a person fails to
even see or
recognize the achievements of others -- my correction of Euclid's
Infinitude of Primes
Proof -- then they do not belong in education nor science. When they
hate someone
so much that they fail to recognize achievement, then they should not
be here.

If you want to sling arrows on the Internet and in newspaper print,
then expect a volley
coming in the other direction.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies