Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


History > General History > Re: The Profita...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 8 Topic 9689 of 10248
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society

by Day Brown <daybrown@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 9, 2008 at 04:12 AM

Polite discourse appreciated Hardpan. but to move on from where we are, 
which is not well defined, to some of the scenarios we mite be 
confronted with. Which may not wait til next year, or even the election.

If foreign holders of dollar denominated securities start dumping, with 
global communications, it could all come down over nite. Any nite. We 
can still hope the election discourse provides foreign investors the 
idea that their holdings will be worth something, but I've not seen word 
one from any candidate yet.

I've lived most of the last 40 years in the Ozark boonies, and never 
been gladder of it. I spoke with a young couple moving here who are also 
concerned earlier today. And every time I drive to town, I see new 
McMansions and starter castles going up. There's no decline in real 
estate values in the Arkansas Ozarks. Dont imagine there is in Idaho, 
Montana, or Alaska either.

But I've already got most of the firewood I'll need next winter already 
cut. That'll be a ***** in those northern states. Especially if nobody 
has chainsaw gas. Nevertheless, if four men can share a house, they can 
cut the wood to heat it with a two man saw. I was born on a farm in MN 
in 1939, and remember it that way.

Course, back then, it was big families, so the old man had 3 sons. Now, 
with just one or two kids, the nuclear family just cant cut it. I mean 
that literally as well. The young couple that stayed over at my place 
last nite seem to realize the problem. Lesbians and fairies, who are not 
fixated on the nuclear family model seem to get that as well.

But for whoever, moving here is win/win. All the construction by the 
early boomer retirees created lotsa jobs. Transnationals also seem to be 
moving in to the mid size (10,000-40,000 pop) towns along I-40, where 
folks tend to stay put cause they all have kin in the area. Job turnover 
is lower, and while the payroll cost is lower too, so is the cost of 
living. The land prices the rich pay for lake front or mountain tops are 
still going up, but there's lotsa shacks in the woods that are cheap, or 
even feasible to squat in.

Another issue Diamond dealt with twards the end of "Collapse" is how the 
areas that have timber- which provide fire wood and lumber, recover the
fastest from economic or social crisis. The Baltic nations had timber 
and lotsa lakes and swamps that broke up the land preventing large 
factory farms. So, when the schitt hit the fan, the small farmers didnt 
need to talk to a banker, but just went ahead and ****fted production to 
meet the local market needs. The Ozarks are too steep for agribusiness, 
so its still all family farms here, and the same deal. No doubt, there 
are parts of the Northern States like this to find if you look.

A town of less than 40,000 with lotsa small farms around could make out 
pretty well. Its not so many people that a horse and cart cant haul 
produce to town and back in the same day from a rural fringe that's only 
a few miles away. I dont see how a major metro area could function 
without the fuel for produce trucks. Most of the cities'd look like the 
same kind of disaster zones New Orleans was, with looting all over.

When corruption destroyed the Roman republic, Caesar'd just finished 
looting Gaul, so he had the *money* to pay his troops to restore order. 
Today, I dont think a general handing out nice lithographs of dead 
presidents will persuade his troops to obey him. Nobody, not even the 
streetgang leaders, has the real gold to pay his men with. Many areas 
would see gangs roaming with pickup trucks as long as there's any gas at 
all, out to get whatever they can from whoever they think has it.

But steep forested land, like the Ozarks, or the Rockies, or Alaska, 
would enable a few snipers to keep even fairly well organized forces 
out. Clausewitz, ON WAR:"when confronted with steep forested land, take 
your army around it." No doubt, farmers and ranchers'll figure that out.
I see lotsa X-military moving into my neck of Ozark woods who already 
have that figured out. Its why they are coming.

If the global economy keeps on muddling thru despite how bad it looks, 
life in the boonies is still pretty good, and broadband is coming so 
they'll be able to stay informed about what is going on. I spoze we'll 
still get snowed in a few days every winter, but that's no biggie. The 
smart people who have all this worked out make better neighbors than the 
couch spuds in the cities. Stay tuned. Maybe you'll get a clue on when 
to drop out, hopefully ahead of the crowd. You dont wanna get stuck on 
the freeway out of town.
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Hardpan <hardpan_101@[  2008-07-07 23:40:23 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Day Brown <daybrown@[E  2008-07-08 13:26:33 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Sir Frederick <mmcneil  2008-07-08 11:58:15 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Hardpan <hardpan_101@[  2008-07-08 19:27:52 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Day Brown <daybrown@[E  2008-07-08 22:33:08 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Hardpan <hardpan_101@[  2008-07-08 19:48:55 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Day Brown <daybrown@[E  2008-07-09 04:12:09 
Re: The Profitable Dismantling of Civil Society
Immortalist <reanimate  2008-07-08 19:34:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Dec 2 6:40:25 CST 2008.